Cyber Crisis Communication in Humanitarian Organizations: A Comparative Content Analysis of WFP and ICRC Responses to Data Breaches
نوع المنشور
ورقة مؤتمر
المؤلفون
النص الكامل
تحميل

Humanitarian organizations increasingly depend on digital registration and data-management systems to deliver aid, a dependence accompanied by rising exposure to cyberattacks against conflict-affected and displaced populations. This study undertakes a qualitative comparative content analysis of the crisis communication responses of two major humanitarian actors - the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), following its 2021-2022 data breach affecting more than 515,000 people, and the World Food Programme (WFP), following its 2026 breach of the Self-Registration Application for Palestine affecting approximately 600,000 Gaza households. Initial source verification indicates that both cases are independently documented and sufficiently comparable for a preliminary comparative analysis, while important differences in temporal observability remain: the ICRC corpus spans a documented communication trajectory from January to at least June 2022, while the WFP corpus, as currently assembled, spans four confirmed official communications issued between 31 May and 9 June 2026. Drawing on organizations' official communications, coded inductively across an evidence-linked scheme before engagement with Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT) and Image Repair Theory (IRT), the analysis identifies a shared underlying sequence - acknowledgement, containment, corrective action, beneficiary guidance, and continuity assurance - alongside a divergence in how each organization treats the limits of its own disclosure. The ICRC corpus documents an accountability- and explanation-centered pattern in which limited disclosure is accompanied by an explicit, organization-stated protective rationale, termed here protection-bounded transparency. The WFP corpus, extended through 29 July 2026, documents comparably limited disclosure - including an internal staff directive to avoid technical explanation of the incident - without an equivalent stated rationale, a pattern termed institutional reticence and explicitly contested as unjustified by external stakeholders. The study proposes a preliminary Humanitarian Cyber Crisis Communication and Protection Framework (HCCCPF), organized around a central Protection Boundary construct requiring organizations to state, not merely enact, the rationale for any limits on disclosure. This framework is offered as an evidence-grounded but provisional contribution, pending closure of the full communication corpus for both cases.

المؤتمر
عنوان المؤتمر
مؤتمر النجاح الاول لتطبيقات الذكاء الاصطناعي
دولة المؤتمر
فلسطين
تاريخ المؤتمر
18 أكتوبر، 2026 - 18 أكتوبر، 2026
راعي المؤتمر
جامعة النجاح
معلومات إضافية
موقع المؤتمر الإلكتروني