Bibliometric analysis on global Catha edulis (khat) research production during the period of 1952-2014
Publication Type
Original research
Authors
Fulltext
Download

BACKGROUND:Publication of scientific articles related to khat (Catha edulis) in peer-reviewed journals is considered a measure of research productivity. The principal objectives of this study were to quantify the research contribution related to khat at the global level, as well as to determine its relative growth rate, collaborative measures taken, productivity at the institutional level, and the most prolific journals publishing on the topic.
METHODS:
On the basis of title words related to khat, publications were identified for all data in Scopus bibliographic database's history up to December 31, 2014. The research productivity for the top 10 countries was evaluated in relation to the population size and gross domestic product (GDP) in 2013.
RESULTS:
The criteria were met by 651documents published in 51 countries. The largest number of articles associated with khat was from the UK (15.2 %), followed by Yemen (10.3 %), the USA (9.7 %) and Ethiopia (9.1 %). Ethiopia, Yemen, and Kenya had the highest productivity of publications after standardization by population size and GDP. Furthermore, Yemen achieved the highest number of collaborations, by having researchers from 19 countries. Ethiopia followed, having researchers from 16 countries.
CONCLUSIONS:
This bibliometric study provides a demonstration for the worldwide research activity regarding khat. The number of articles related to khat has increased rapidly over the last 10 years. The present study is a good starting point to evaluate research activity in the field of khat. Although the data shows a promising increase in the research activity, the quantity of khat-related research is still too little compared to the massive use of khat in certain countries.

Journal
Title
Global Health. 2015 Sep 4;11(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12992-015-0124-x.
Publisher
BioMed Central
Publisher Country
United Kingdom
Indexing
Thomson Reuters
Impact Factor
2.25
Publication Type
Both (Printed and Online)
Volume
11
Year
2015
Pages
--